Grumpy Old Sod Dot Com - an internet voice for the exasperated. Sick of the nanny state? Pissed off with politicians? Annoyed by newspapers? Irate with the internet? Tell us about it!

Send us an email
Go back

 

 
Our Wanker of the Week award
Captain Grumpy's bedtime reading. You can buy them too, if you think you're grumpy enough!
Readers wives. Yes, really!
More Grumpy Old Sods on the net
Sign our Guest Book
 

 
NO2ID - Stop ID cards and the database state
 

 

 

 

 

 
Reported in the Sunday Times this week
 
Ministers are preparing to allow people labelled "idiots" and "lunatics" to stand for parliament. Though it may come as a surprise for voters, laws dating back to Elizabethan times bar this category of people from becoming MPs. Idiots are defined as those "incapable of gaining reason" and lunatics as people only "capable of periods of lucidity".
 
The rules ban lunatics from standing as MPs in "their non-lucid intervals". They also ban anyone sectioned under the Mental Health Act from standing for parliament, even if they have made a recovery. MPs have to give up their seat for life if they are sectioned for six months.
 
Bridget Prentice, the justice minister, is to consult on scrapping the laws after complaints from MPs and mental health charities that they are discriminatory.
 
"People who have suffered mental health problems can function at a very high level", said a spokesman for Mind, the mental health charity. "Look at Stephen Fry. He has been open about his manic depression and people would be shocked if somebody like him were not eligible to stand".
 
A survey of MPs found that 27% had experience of mental health problems. One in three said the stigma stopped them from being open about it.
 

 
The GOS says: No comment needed from us, I think.
 
I would like to pose this question, though: shouldn't this principle be applied in many other walks of life too? If it's "discriminatory" to bar a lunatic from being an MP, isn't it also "discriminatory" to ban, say, a paedophile from being a teacher? And couldn't we recruit criminals into the police force? Or ordain atheists into the priesthood?
 
On a personal note, I have two unfulfilled ambitions, to be a brain surgeon and to play cricket for England. It's highly discrimatory to prevent me from doing so on the flimsy excuse that I have no medical training and am a useless cricketer.
 
I think that makes me an oppressed minority, doesn't it?

 

 
Grumpy Old Sod.com - homepage
 

 
Use this Yahoo Search box to find more grumpy places,
either on this site or on the World Wide Web.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Copyright © 2008 The GOS
 
This site created and maintained by PlainSite
Grumpy Old Sod.com - homepage

 

Captain Grumpy's
Favourites
- some older posts

 
Campaign
 
Proposal
 
Bullies
 
Burglars
 
Defence
 
ID cards
 
Old folk
 
Hairy man
 
Democracy
 
Killer cows
 
Mud
 
The NHS
 
Violence
 
Effluent
 
Respect
 
Litter
 
Weapons
 
The church
 
Blame
 
Parenting
 
Pedophiles
 
The Pope
 
Punishing
 
Racism
 
Scientists
 
Smoking
 
Stupidity
 
Swimming
 
Envirocrap
 
Spying